|
|
| |
ADFX HOME > AWARD CATEGORIES |
|
|
ADFX accepts entries under four category headings. Click on the heading that interest you to go directly to it.
A
QUICK GUIDE TO THE FOUR CATEGORIES
Before deciding what
category to enter under, ask yourself a question.
Where does my brand fit?
-
If it is a new product
or one that has not been advertised before, your
case history is Category 1 material.
-
Category 2 is designed
for brands that already have an advertising history.
These case studies should refer to advertising campaigns
that have had a positive sales effect for that brand
in the last two years.
-
Category 3 case histories
are essentially the same but cover a period of over
two years.
-
Finally if your case
history relates to more than one market, enter it
into Category 4
|
|

|
Products
or services which are new to market or have no significant
history of advertising.
It has been traditionally
recognised that the effects of advertising can be at their
most powerful and dramatic when a new product or service
is launched. It is in these cases that advertising can make
people aware of a new product or brand, acting as the catalyst
making them want to try it.
However, a successful new
product launch is not necessarily proof that its advertising
was effective. A competent new product or concept, with
efficient distribution, will achieve certain levels of success
without any advertising.
The judges will be interested
in cases where advertising not only gained initial interest
and trial, but also laid the foundations for longer-term
brand success by creating a distinctive positioning and/or
an emotional bond with the customer. The launch campaign
must have commenced during the period
January 1st 2004 to June 30th 2006.
|
 |
New
campaign for a previously advertised brand, which resulted
in significant short-term effects on sales or behaviour
over a period of less than two years.
As in the case of new products,
the onus is on the author to show that the increase in sales
(or awareness) was caused at least in part by the advertising
and not by some other factor such as price cutting, improved
distribution or the main competitor being on strike.
Cases will be greatly strengthened
by corroborative evidence of how the advertising worked,
using intermediate measures such as advertising recall,
brand image studies, and, not least, qualitative research.
All of this is important in building a coherent and plausible
story. The campaign must have started between January 1st
2004 and June 30th 2006.
|
 |
A
longer term advertising campaign which benefited a business
by maintaining or strengthening a brand over a period of
two years or more.
Although everyone is usually
delighted when a campaign shows dramatic short-term results,
the more common justification for advertising is the long
term protection and consolidation of a brand's profitability.
A successful brand will exhibit
customer loyalty; lower price elasticity; ability to launch
new products; standing with the retailer; more productive
promotions; resistance to competitive pressure; in general,
greater sales strength.
These questions can be answered
by reviewing other possible contributory factors and building
up a picture from research of how the advertising could
have achieved such a result. It is difficult to put a precise
value on the contribution of advertising in this category.
But the ultimate benefit to the client should be demonstrated
in terms of the long-term profitability.
Long term campaigns should
have been running for over two years. Campaigns that were
entered in the 1998 or 2000 AD-FX Awards can be re-entered,
provided significant new material was produced during the
period January 1st 2004 to June 30th 2006.
|
 |
Advertising
campaigns for products or services created for two or more
distinct national territories
The international category,
new for 2004, is designed to recognise the increasing importance
of Irish originated advertising that contributed to international
and global advertising strategies. As in the previous categories,
the onus is on the author to show the successful marketing
campaign effects were primarily the result of the Irish
generated advertising activity and not a product of market
conditions.
The campaign has to have run
in at least two international territories, one of which
may be Ireland/Northern Ireland. Cases will be greatly strengthened
by corroborative evidence of how the advertising worked,
using intermediate measures such as advertising recall,
brand image studies and qualitative or quantitative research.
All of this is important in building a coherent and plausible
story. The campaign must have started between January 1st
2004 and June 30th 2006.
|
|
| NEW FOR 2006: SPECIAL JURY PRIZES |
|
These prizes are awarded by the jury for excellence in their particular discipline. Entrants do not need to enter a submission for a jury prize as they are selected from the total entry received in the four open categories.
|
| BEST INTEGRATED CAMPAIGN AWARD |
This prize will be awarded to the entry that best illustrates campaign integration in its case history. As brands fight harder to engage customers in our fragmented marketplace, integration and alignment of all advertising activity is essential.
To win this award the entry needs to illustrate a compelling campaign idea that is delivered consistently across all channels. The power of integration should be illustrated across the channels used and supported by quantitative and qualitative data.
|
| BEST STRATEGIC PLANNING AWARD |
This prize will be awarded to the entry that illustrates the most innovative, persuasive and memorable brand proposition and clearly develops its refinement through the Strategic Planning process. As an added incentive this award is given to the lead Planner/case history author on the campaign. |
|
|
|